> gg wrote: > Baylor should own the domain due to "confusion" - I would argue it is > indeed tortious interference. >
I should add I have no idea what the torts are or what the law is around cybersquatting (cause I'm lazy and it ain't my field), but I'm assuming that Baylor U's claim that Bruce has to relinquish his domain simply because it's similar to their name is a wrongful claim. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;160198600;22374440;w Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:248784 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
