So you're OK with a single Judge defining science and religion? Sounds scary to me. I got the impression they were more into teaching evolution is not complete than teaching about a designer
On Jan 7, 2008 1:38 PM, Jim Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >I thought we determined ID doesn't teach religion or anything about the > >Designer > > Scientifically I'm perfectly willing to accept ID as it presents itself. And > as it presents itself it doesn't meet the rigor of scientific inquiry. As it > presents itself it's not science and shouldn't be taught as science in > schools. > > Legally however it's already been ruled that ID is clearly thinnly veiled > religion. As religion it's not science and shouldn't be taught as science in > schools. > > Jim Davis > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;160198600;22374440;w Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:250024 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
