Interesting....thanks for the info again Mike. Kevin
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 11:44 AM To: CF-Community Subject: RE: Circumcision article link A Kosher rare steak might have some 'meat juice' in it but the blood has all been drained and the meat has been salted. If you ate a Kosher steak I'd expect it to taste very different than a non-Kosher one. At 12:43 PM 4/12/02, you wrote: >What about rare steak? > > >-----Original Message----- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 11:42 AM >To: CF-Community >Subject: RE: Circumcision article link > >No Jewish vampires either. >Yes, one can eat non-Kosher is their life depends on it but vampires are >by definition not alive so their life can't depend on it. i.e. a vampire >who's Jewish and religious has to starve. > >At 12:31 PM 4/12/02, you wrote: >>Gee, somehow I knew the Masai weren't Jewish >>;-) >> >> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >>> Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 9:31 AM >>> To: CF-Community >>> Subject: RE: Circumcision article link >>> >>> >>> At 12:19 PM 4/12/02, you wrote: >>> >thanks, not eating pork is always something i've wondered about. >>> > >>> >whats the exact religious reason? >>> Laws of ritual purity when dealing with what you eat. Land >>> animals have to have split hooves and chew their cud. Sea >>> animals have to have fins and scales. Birds of prey >>> (depending on claw configuration) are not allowed. Those are >>> the basics. Also, blood is not allowed. >>> >>> >>> >>> >-----Original Message----- >>> >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >>> >Sent: 12 April 2002 16:52 >>> >To: CF-Community >>> >Subject: RE: Circumcision article link >>> > >>> > >>> >Pig is one of the animals specifically mentioned as being >>> not allowed. Even >>> >when I wasn't religious I didn't eat it (and I was just a >>> kid). Closest I've >>> >come is soy bacon. salty, but I love it. :) >>> > >>> >At 11:39 AM 4/12/02, you wrote: >>> >>so as far as your concerned it's a commandment not to eat pork? >>> >> >>> >>-----Original Message----- >>> >>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >>> >>Sent: 12 April 2002 16:40 >>> >>To: CF-Community >>> >>Subject: Re: Circumcision article link >>> >> >>> >> >>> >>Actually, a religious person (at least this one) looks at >>> it and says that >>> >>its a commandment and I'm doing it because its a >>> commandment. If science >>> >>says that the commandment has a physical effect, then fine >>> and good. The >>> >>physical effect is totally secondary to the spiritual effect. >>> >>To say that the commandment or every commandment was done >>> for a physical >>> >>reason such as health opens the door to denial of the root of the >>> >>commandment. Hey, not eating pork was because of >>> trichinosis. If we cook it >>> >>right then we wouldn't get the disease and we can now eat >>> it. Same for all >>> >>the other commandments. This is the rational of the reform >>> movement and a >>> >>rational rejected by religious Jews. >>> >> >>> >>At 03:51 AM 4/12/02, you wrote: >>> >>>It seems that much of the old testament law, such as >>> circumcision, what to >>> >>eat and not to eat, etc., has a good basis in what is >>> healthy, especailly >>> >>given the lack of sanitary conditions of the times. >>> >>> >>> >>>A religious person might argue that this is God making up >>> the lack of >>> >>science of the time to protect people. A non-believer might >>> argue that this >>> >>is wise people coming up religious law to mirror their own >>> observations >>> >>about what makes a person sick. Either way, it >>> demonstrates a good deal of >>> >>wisdom in the old books. >>> >>> >>> >>>H. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>---------- Original Message ---------------------------------- >>> >>>from: "Braver, Ben" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> >>>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> >>>date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 19:56:23 -0700 >>> >>> >>> >>>>Found a link to the original article on circumcision & >>> risk of cervical >>> >>>>cancer - it's in the New England Journal of Medicine: >>> >>>>http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/short/346/15/1105 >>> >>>> >>> >>>>Apparently, the foreskin is particularly susceptible to >>> infection from >>> >HPV >>> >>- >>> >>>>human papilloma virus - which is linked to cervical cancer. >>> >>>> >>> >>>>-Ben >>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >> >>> >> >>> > >>> > >>> >> > > ______________________________________________________________________ Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
