Why is filet a no no?
-----Original Message----- From: Braver, Ben [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 11:42 AM To: CF-Community Subject: RE: Circumcision article link Mikey- tell 'em about which kinds of steak are ok, which not! (e.g. no Filet) -Ben > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 9:44 AM > To: CF-Community > Subject: RE: Circumcision article link > > > A Kosher rare steak might have some 'meat juice' in it but > the blood has all been drained and the meat has been salted. > If you ate a Kosher steak I'd expect it to taste very > different than a non-Kosher one. > > At 12:43 PM 4/12/02, you wrote: > >What about rare steak? > > > > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > >Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 11:42 AM > >To: CF-Community > >Subject: RE: Circumcision article link > > > >No Jewish vampires either. > >Yes, one can eat non-Kosher is their life depends on it but > vampires are > >by definition not alive so their life can't depend on it. > i.e. a vampire > >who's Jewish and religious has to starve. > > > >At 12:31 PM 4/12/02, you wrote: > >>Gee, somehow I knew the Masai weren't Jewish > >>;-) > >> > >> > >>> -----Original Message----- > >>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > >>> Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 9:31 AM > >>> To: CF-Community > >>> Subject: RE: Circumcision article link > >>> > >>> > >>> At 12:19 PM 4/12/02, you wrote: > >>> >thanks, not eating pork is always something i've wondered about. > >>> > > >>> >whats the exact religious reason? > >>> Laws of ritual purity when dealing with what you eat. Land > >>> animals have to have split hooves and chew their cud. Sea > >>> animals have to have fins and scales. Birds of prey > >>> (depending on claw configuration) are not allowed. Those are > >>> the basics. Also, blood is not allowed. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> >-----Original Message----- > >>> >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > >>> >Sent: 12 April 2002 16:52 > >>> >To: CF-Community > >>> >Subject: RE: Circumcision article link > >>> > > >>> > > >>> >Pig is one of the animals specifically mentioned as being > >>> not allowed. Even > >>> >when I wasn't religious I didn't eat it (and I was just a > >>> kid). Closest I've > >>> >come is soy bacon. salty, but I love it. :) > >>> > > >>> >At 11:39 AM 4/12/02, you wrote: > >>> >>so as far as your concerned it's a commandment not to eat pork? > >>> >> > >>> >>-----Original Message----- > >>> >>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > >>> >>Sent: 12 April 2002 16:40 > >>> >>To: CF-Community > >>> >>Subject: Re: Circumcision article link > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >>Actually, a religious person (at least this one) looks at > >>> it and says that > >>> >>its a commandment and I'm doing it because its a > >>> commandment. If science > >>> >>says that the commandment has a physical effect, then fine > >>> and good. The > >>> >>physical effect is totally secondary to the spiritual effect. > >>> >>To say that the commandment or every commandment was done > >>> for a physical > >>> >>reason such as health opens the door to denial of the > root of the > >>> >>commandment. Hey, not eating pork was because of > >>> trichinosis. If we cook it > >>> >>right then we wouldn't get the disease and we can now eat > >>> it. Same for all > >>> >>the other commandments. This is the rational of the reform > >>> movement and a > >>> >>rational rejected by religious Jews. > >>> >> > >>> >>At 03:51 AM 4/12/02, you wrote: > >>> >>>It seems that much of the old testament law, such as > >>> circumcision, what to > >>> >>eat and not to eat, etc., has a good basis in what is > >>> healthy, especailly > >>> >>given the lack of sanitary conditions of the times. > >>> >>> > >>> >>>A religious person might argue that this is God making up > >>> the lack of > >>> >>science of the time to protect people. A non-believer might > >>> argue that this > >>> >>is wise people coming up religious law to mirror their own > >>> observations > >>> >>about what makes a person sick. Either way, it > >>> demonstrates a good deal of > >>> >>wisdom in the old books. > >>> >>> > >>> >>>H. > >>> >>> > >>> >>> > >>> >>>---------- Original Message ---------------------------------- > >>> >>>from: "Braver, Ben" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>> >>>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>> >>>date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 19:56:23 -0700 > >>> >>> > >>> >>>>Found a link to the original article on circumcision & > >>> risk of cervical > >>> >>>>cancer - it's in the New England Journal of Medicine: > >>> >>>>http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/short/346/15/1105 > >>> >>>> > >>> >>>>Apparently, the foreskin is particularly susceptible to > >>> infection from > >>> >HPV > >>> >>- > >>> >>>>human papilloma virus - which is linked to cervical cancer. > >>> >>>> > >>> >>>>-Ben > >>> >>>> > >>> >>> > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > >> > > > > > ______________________________________________________________________ Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
