That's right, make me work for it. At 12:42 PM 4/12/02, you wrote: >Mikey- >tell 'em about which kinds of steak are ok, which not! (e.g. no Filet) >-Ben > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >> Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 9:44 AM >> To: CF-Community >> Subject: RE: Circumcision article link >> >> >> A Kosher rare steak might have some 'meat juice' in it but >> the blood has all been drained and the meat has been salted. >> If you ate a Kosher steak I'd expect it to taste very >> different than a non-Kosher one. >> >> At 12:43 PM 4/12/02, you wrote: >> >What about rare steak? >> > >> > >> >-----Original Message----- >> >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >> >Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 11:42 AM >> >To: CF-Community >> >Subject: RE: Circumcision article link >> > >> >No Jewish vampires either. >> >Yes, one can eat non-Kosher is their life depends on it but >> vampires are >> >by definition not alive so their life can't depend on it. >> i.e. a vampire >> >who's Jewish and religious has to starve. >> > >> >At 12:31 PM 4/12/02, you wrote: >> >>Gee, somehow I knew the Masai weren't Jewish >> >>;-) >> >> >> >> >> >>> -----Original Message----- >> >>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >> >>> Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 9:31 AM >> >>> To: CF-Community >> >>> Subject: RE: Circumcision article link >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> At 12:19 PM 4/12/02, you wrote: >> >>> >thanks, not eating pork is always something i've wondered about. >> >>> > >> >>> >whats the exact religious reason? >> >>> Laws of ritual purity when dealing with what you eat. Land >> >>> animals have to have split hooves and chew their cud. Sea >> >>> animals have to have fins and scales. Birds of prey >> >>> (depending on claw configuration) are not allowed. Those are >> >>> the basics. Also, blood is not allowed. >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >-----Original Message----- >> >>> >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >> >>> >Sent: 12 April 2002 16:52 >> >>> >To: CF-Community >> >>> >Subject: RE: Circumcision article link >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> >Pig is one of the animals specifically mentioned as being >> >>> not allowed. Even >> >>> >when I wasn't religious I didn't eat it (and I was just a >> >>> kid). Closest I've >> >>> >come is soy bacon. salty, but I love it. :) >> >>> > >> >>> >At 11:39 AM 4/12/02, you wrote: >> >>> >>so as far as your concerned it's a commandment not to eat pork? >> >>> >> >> >>> >>-----Original Message----- >> >>> >>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >> >>> >>Sent: 12 April 2002 16:40 >> >>> >>To: CF-Community >> >>> >>Subject: Re: Circumcision article link >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >>Actually, a religious person (at least this one) looks at >> >>> it and says that >> >>> >>its a commandment and I'm doing it because its a >> >>> commandment. If science >> >>> >>says that the commandment has a physical effect, then fine >> >>> and good. The >> >>> >>physical effect is totally secondary to the spiritual effect. >> >>> >>To say that the commandment or every commandment was done >> >>> for a physical >> >>> >>reason such as health opens the door to denial of the >> root of the >> >>> >>commandment. Hey, not eating pork was because of >> >>> trichinosis. If we cook it >> >>> >>right then we wouldn't get the disease and we can now eat >> >>> it. Same for all >> >>> >>the other commandments. This is the rational of the reform >> >>> movement and a >> >>> >>rational rejected by religious Jews. >> >>> >> >> >>> >>At 03:51 AM 4/12/02, you wrote: >> >>> >>>It seems that much of the old testament law, such as >> >>> circumcision, what to >> >>> >>eat and not to eat, etc., has a good basis in what is >> >>> healthy, especailly >> >>> >>given the lack of sanitary conditions of the times. >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>A religious person might argue that this is God making up >> >>> the lack of >> >>> >>science of the time to protect people. A non-believer might >> >>> argue that this >> >>> >>is wise people coming up religious law to mirror their own >> >>> observations >> >>> >>about what makes a person sick. Either way, it >> >>> demonstrates a good deal of >> >>> >>wisdom in the old books. >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>H. >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>---------- Original Message ---------------------------------- >> >>> >>>from: "Braver, Ben" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >>> >>>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >>> >>>date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 19:56:23 -0700 >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>>Found a link to the original article on circumcision & >> >>> risk of cervical >> >>> >>>>cancer - it's in the New England Journal of Medicine: >> >>> >>>>http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/short/346/15/1105 >> >>> >>>> >> >>> >>>>Apparently, the foreskin is particularly susceptible to >> >>> infection from >> >>> >HPV >> >>> >>- >> >>> >>>>human papilloma virus - which is linked to cervical cancer. >> >>> >>>> >> >>> >>>>-Ben >> >>> >>>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> >> >> >> > >> > >> > ______________________________________________________________________ Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
