> >how is this dangerous to drivers? > > One more distraction,
If the driver is distracted, thats the driver's problem. > >The bike doesn't a) do damage to the environment b) do damage to the road, > >therefore it shouldn't have to pay the way a vehicle does, IMO. > > Here, the gas taxes pay for the roads, Cyclists don't pay a gas tax, so it > is as if they get the road for free, yet I pay $6.60 a week in my gas tax > for the privilege of having usable roads. You don't pay because they do > damage you pay to use them and build them in the first place. Maybe we should make Kevin's SUV pay more than my bike, what you think? ;-) ______________________________________________________________________ Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
