On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 11:42 AM, Sam <[email protected]> wrote: > You were defending them against the current accusations by claiming > the good outweighed the bad. That's changing the subject, let's focus > on the charges at hand.
No, I never defended them regarding the current actions. I said it should be investigated repeatedly. However, you are trying to use the current accusations to paint the entire organization with an overly broad brush. That is what I disagree with. > Apples and oranges. ACORN is under investigation in many states for > many wrong doings. This is another item to add to the list. This also > seems to show a pattern of training. And most of those investigations have found nothing. > Depends on the age, and the type of information being taught. > But for you it's black and white and you are always right in your mind. That's hilarious. Accusing me of seeing it black and white? I said that abstinence *only* education is horrid precisely because it is presenting the matter in black and white. I see the abstinence only education issue in black and white because the program itself is exactly in black and white. That, in case you missed it, is the "only" part. I was precisely arguing for an educational approach that looks at shades of grey. You're funny. Judah ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:304396 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
