well it kinda was if we understood it correctly, because however
sympathetic the plaintiff might have been, he just did not have the
law on his side.

On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 8:49 PM, Eric Roberts
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> That was hardly a frivolous lawsuit...

===
> The suing of the city has some pretty good reasons for NOT doing it. Any
> suit against a city that is lost owes legal costs.  That is a well
> established deterrent to frivolous lawsuits. Just ask the father of the
> Marine who now owes Phelps tens of thousands of dollars

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know 
on the House of Fusion mailing lists
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:316756
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm

Reply via email to