I don't think you read his second post: "Head shots indicate:
1) The shot was made at close range" He states that it was at close range because it was a "head shot". A "head shot" does not indicate a shot at close range, it indicates a shot to the head There is other evidence to indicate it was at close range, but that evidence would still be present if the guy was shot in the foot at close range. So while these shots were "head shots" AND at close range, it does not mean that "head shots" always indicate shots at close range. On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 9:30 AM, Medic <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> 1. For the record, a 'head shot' does not indicate a shot made at close >> range. >> > > I don't think you read Vivvy's first post: > > "From the analysis of the bullet distance on one of the bodies," Dr. Ince > said, "the gun was fired between 2 and 14 centimeters' distance from the > victim's head." > > Hmmm, 3/4 of an inch to 3 1/2 inches away. I'd say that's pretty fnucking > "close range." > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology-Michael-Dinowitz/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:320199 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
