I'd like to think that even an average marksman can make a head shot, on a pitching boat, from 15-20 feet away - you do not need to be fairly close to someone or William Tell to get a head shot, even on a boat.
To me, 'being mobbed' does not necessarily mean that everyone involved is inches form me. And, more semantics, they were not in the ocean. On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 10:07 AM, Vivec <[email protected]> wrote: > > Semantics...but generally to make a head shot you have to be an excellent > marksman, especially on a pitching ship in the ocean, or be at fairly close > range man. > You are talking about some olympic medal class shooting there if they were > far away. > And, if they were far away why did they report that they were mobbed? > > Of course...the 'relevance' of this is that If you were at distance and had > the time, why go for a killing shot against civilians? > > On 4 June 2010 10:03, Scott Stroz <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> He states that it was at close range because it was a "head shot". A >> "head shot" does not indicate a shot at close range, it indicates a >> shot to the head There is other evidence to indicate it was at close >> range, but that evidence would still be present if the guy was shot in >> the foot at close range. >> >> So while these shots were "head shots" AND at close range, it does not >> mean that "head shots" always indicate shots at close range. >> >> > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology-Michael-Dinowitz/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:320201 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
