Semantics...but generally to make a head shot you have to be an excellent marksman, especially on a pitching ship in the ocean, or be at fairly close range man. You are talking about some olympic medal class shooting there if they were far away. And, if they were far away why did they report that they were mobbed?
Of course...the 'relevance' of this is that If you were at distance and had the time, why go for a killing shot against civilians? On 4 June 2010 10:03, Scott Stroz <[email protected]> wrote: > > He states that it was at close range because it was a "head shot". A > "head shot" does not indicate a shot at close range, it indicates a > shot to the head There is other evidence to indicate it was at close > range, but that evidence would still be present if the guy was shot in > the foot at close range. > > So while these shots were "head shots" AND at close range, it does not > mean that "head shots" always indicate shots at close range. > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology-Michael-Dinowitz/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:320200 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
