And you said politifact wasn't biased :) 4 million lost jobs at the end of the Bush term, 6 million under Obama. No new jobs created except census, and they're finished. So your argument is that people aren't losing jobs as fast as they were? The real story is nobody's getting hired for three years. See the problem?
PS So your point isn't that unemployment is at the pre-Bush levels. Your argument is the jobs loss is steady and no longer accelerating. On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 6:03 PM, Eric Roberts <[email protected]> wrote: > > http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2010/oct/28/barack-obama/ > obama-says-most-job-loss-occurred-his-economic-pol/ > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Sam [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Saturday, October 30, 2010 4:30 PM > To: cf-community > Subject: Re: That was quick > > \> You said they were back to pre-Bush levels. Then you said they were at > last years levels. It's the writing that off. My question was what was > it when Obama took office since pre-Bush is a little vague. > >> There was a little uptick about 2005/2006 then things went right back > down. > > Well you must have been living in a different country that decad > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:330677 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
