No...Clinton said we didn't have enough evidence to convict him so it would be a waste of time, money and potentially, lives to go and try to arrest him at the time.
-----Original Message----- From: Sam [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2011 2:32 PM To: cf-community Subject: Re: Another WMD debate? That's probably what the Clinton team said about bin Laden. . On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 3:27 PM, GMoney <[email protected]> wrote: > > something for your conservative bulletin board: YES, we should have > risked thousand, maybe millions, of American lives and NOT invaded > Iraq...because the chance that Saddam was really going to attack us > with a WMD was so ridiculously small, that it really wasn't a risk at all. > > There. > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:342866 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
