So innocent if not convicted? Let's apply that to your comment:
"It's not about money. It's about how you obtained the money, and if it was obtained by fraud, then punishing those who are guilty. Which in the case of most of the Wall Street firms involved in the financial meltdown, has not happened." Are all but the three mentioned earlier guilty or does not getting convicted make the whole statement moot? I would think you were implicating them more than any other individuals. . On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 12:51 PM, Maureen <[email protected]> wrote: > > And neither of those constitute fraud, or both would have been prosecuted by > now. Herman Cain was head of the Kansas City Fed. Does that make the > Hermanator a crook too? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:343628 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
