On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 4:06 AM, Maureen <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> They don't have to prove innocence.  They are innocent until proven guilty -
> in a court of law, by their peers.
>
> There are people in both government and industry who are guilty of
> malfeasance.  I don't know who they are, but if they are found to be guilty
> they should be punished.  Do you disagree with that position?

If you put it that way I would like to say anyone found guilty of a
punishable offense should be punished.

> You slam
> anyone working in the current government, yet defend any one on Wall Street
> who might be guilty.   Chaos rules on your planet, doesn't it?

No, I slammed three guys that are proven to be failures. To Obama's
defense, I'm sure Bush wouldn't have fired them either. But damn, we
tried and failed, let's move on with new people.

I also didn't defend anyone on Wall Street. I pointed out where you
should focus your investigation for your new theory.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:343649
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm

Reply via email to