Not only have they not been convicted, they haven't even been charged. We have due process for a reason.
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 10:29 AM, Sam <[email protected]> wrote: > > So innocent if not convicted? > > Let's apply that to your comment: > > "It's not about money. It's about how you obtained the money, and if it > was > obtained by fraud, then punishing those who are guilty. Which in the case > of most of the Wall Street firms involved in the financial meltdown, has > not > happened." > > Are all but the three mentioned earlier guilty or does not getting > convicted make the whole statement moot? > > I would think you were implicating them more than any other individuals. > > . > > On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 12:51 PM, Maureen <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > And neither of those constitute fraud, or both would have been prosecuted > by > > now. Herman Cain was head of the Kansas City Fed. Does that make the > > Hermanator a crook too? > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:343634 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
