I don't believe in zoning laws at all personally.

I should be able to do whatever I want with my private property so long as
it doesn't leave my property and impact the rights of others outside of my
property.

On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 2:27 PM, Larry C. Lyons <[email protected]>wrote:

>
> In a lot of cases that is what has happened with such things as
> stripper clubs, abortion clinics, certain political party offices, and
> anything not necessarily mainstream or popular. If we condone one
> practice do we condone it all? Its one of those "wedge" issues so to
> speak.
>
> On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 2:05 PM, Judah McAuley <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> > Ah, I missed that. I went back and re-read the article. I really doubt
> > that the whole organization would change it's philosophy based on one
> > restaurant siting decision in Chicago, so I think this is just an
> > Alderman trying to make himself look bigger than he is. However, I
> > agree with you, it is wrong for a city official to be telling a
> > company to change a legal activity if they want to do business in your
> > town. Decisions on a business being allowed in a certain area should
> > be based entirely on zoning rules already in place. You should not
> > ever have a city official be able to say yes or no on the basis of "I
> > don't like you".
> >
> > Thanks for pointing that out, Tim.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Judah
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 10:57 AM, LRS Scout <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >> It wasn't the protests that got him to back down though.  According to
> that
> >> article it was the government.
> >> On Sep 19, 2012 1:56 PM, "Judah McAuley" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >>>
> >>> Isn't that the point of boycotts and social pressure in general?
> >>>
> >>> Extortion, to my mind, happens when you threaten to make something
> >>> illegal or unsavory public unless they give you money. In cases like
> >>> this and with boycotts and public pressure on companies like Apple and
> >>> Nike for conditions in overseas manufacturing, it isn't extortion
> >>> because the fundamental goal is to bring the information to light and
> >>> change the behavior rather than ask for money to let the behavior
> >>> continue and remain secret.
> >>>
> >>> Cheers,
> >>> Judah
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 10:48 AM, Scott Stroz <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >>> >
> >>> > I have to say...I am torn by this.
> >>> >
> >>> > While I appreciate the fact that CFA will no longer donate money to
> >>> > anti-gay groups, it kind of feels like...extortion - for lack of a
> >>> > better word.
> >>> >
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:355391
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm

Reply via email to