On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 2:50 PM, Judah McAuley wrote: > I completely agree, Cam. G seems to be drawing a line around certain > types of government interventions and other types. I was just curious where > he draws the line. What's the difference, in your mind, between > mandating overtime for more than 40 hour weeks for certain job > classifications versus mandating a certain number of paid days off for > certain job classifications?
Honestly, I am not sure that mandating time and a half even needs to be there. It's okay that it is, but it's not really required. I favor competition. Companies that offer shitty bennies have a hard time hiring good people. Also - there is always going to be a bozo-lazy-fuckup who doesn't want to work a real job. Mandating so much means that shithead gets the same wages and bennies as someone who works their ass off all day long. Mandating too much removes not just the competitiveness of companies but the competitiveness of employees too. If Mr. shithead-lazy-bones is getting the same bennies as me, what incentive do I have to go good work, get smarter, and work harder? None. I might as well turn into a worthless lazy fuckup too. You may see that as cynical, but I see it as realistic. -Cameron ... ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:363938 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
