It only requires 1 element...the law states that driving while above a
certain limit, you are violating the law...

-----Original Message-----
From: LRS Scout [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Monday, July 08, 2013 7:41 AM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: DUI Checkpoint Refusal


Who is the victim?

Describe to me the three elements necessary to make it a crime.

According to true common law legal theory, who is the injured party?
On Jul 8, 2013 8:38 AM, "Scott Stroz" <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> The crime occurs when someone operates a motor vehicle under the 
> influence, not when they cause (or are involved in) an accident while 
> under the influence.
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 8:19 AM, LRS Scout <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >
> > Over the limit does not mean there will be an accident. I don't is 
> > even
> a 1
> > in 100 chance of there being an accident.
> >
> > The crime occurs when the accident does and not before.
> > On Jul 8, 2013 8:17 AM, "Scott Stroz" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > How is it 'hypothetical safety'?
> > >
> > > If a single driver who is over the legal limit is taken off the 
> > > road,
> > does
> > > that not make it safer?
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 7:57 AM, LRS Scout <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > In America we call that tyrany.
> > > >
> > > > Individual rights > the hypothetical safety of the group.
> > > > On Jul 8, 2013 7:27 AM, "Scott Stroz" <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Having seen the damage a drunk driver can inflict first hand 
> > > > > (and
> > more
> > > > > times than I care to remember), I don't feel DUI checkpoints 
> > > > > are a violation of anyone's rights. If one life can be saved 
> > > > > by
> > > inconveniencing
> > > > > someone with a camera and an agenda...I am all for it.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 12:33 AM, Judah McAuley <
> [email protected]
> > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Having a camera on hand and ready to record is just smart, 
> > > > > > it
> isn't
> > > > > > necessarily trying to start shit. I'm prejudiced in favor of 
> > > > > > the
> > guy,
> > > > > > however, as I think that DUI checkpoints of that sort are
> > > > > unconstitutional
> > > > > > as they nothing about them that requires any sort of 
> > > > > > probable
> > cause.
> > > > > > Obviously the courts disagree, so that's that.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > But, yeah, I support making life hard for cops at DUI
> checkpoints,
> > > for
> > > > > > screeners at the TSA, etc etc. Know your rights, insist on 
> > > > > > your
> > > rights,
> > > > > > hold the line. Someone has to and it is pretty obvious that 
> > > > > > the
> > > courts
> > > > > and
> > > > > > the legislature isn't going to lead the way at this point in
> > history.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Judah
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Sat, Jul 6, 2013 at 1:08 PM, Scott Stroz 
> > > > > > <[email protected]>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Sounds to me like the guy who made the video was being an ass.
> > Not
> > > > > > illegal,
> > > > > > > but he could have been on his way in much less time had he 
> > > > > > > not
> > > tried
> > > > to
> > > > > > > 'make a point'. The fact that he had the camera ready to 
> > > > > > > go
> > pretty
> > > > much
> > > > > > > shows he was going to try and start shit.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 at 11:37 PM, J.J. Merrick 
> > > > > > > <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > This happened last night in the county next to mine here 
> > > > > > > > in
> > > > > Tennessee.
> > > > > > > The
> > > > > > > > video on Youtube already has half-a-million views and it 
> > > > > > > > is
> > > blowing
> > > > > up
> > > > > > > > LiveLeak...
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > http://www.wkrn.com/story/22770235/dui-checkpoint-video-youtube
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Crazy what times have come to!
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > -J.J.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > |  J.J. Merrick
> > > > > > > > | Owner, Panos Creative
> > > > > > > > |  [email protected]
> > > > > > > > |  p: 615-973-7984
> > > > > > > > |  http://panos.cc
> > > > > > > > |  http://jeremiahx.com
> > > > > > > > |  http://twitter.com/jeremiahx
> > > > > > > > <http://facebook.com/jeremiahx>
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
> 



~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:365285
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm

Reply via email to