I support basic rights. I don't think DUI checkpoints violate mine (or anyone else's) rights.
Still bothered by Tim's implication that it is not a crime to drive under the influence until/unless there is an accident. On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 3:05 PM, Judah McAuley <[email protected]> wrote: > > Negligent homicide is still homicide, without a doubt. Hence why I favor > safety measures on both guns and vehicles. It still isn't intent. > > As gun rights advocates have noted, if you really want to kill someone, you > don't need a gun to do so. I'm sure the same thing can be said of drunk > driving...if there are barriers put in the way, someone will find a way > around them if they really really want to. And that's the difference > between negligence and intent. > > Support basic rights, support reasonable safety measures that make it > difficult to act negligently, support strict penalties for those that act > evilly with intent. > > Cheers, > Judah > > > -- Scott Stroz --------------- You can make things happen, you can watch things happen or you can wonder what the f*&k happened. - Cpt. Phil Harris http://xkcd.com/386/ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:365373 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
