I agree. So why does the Supreme Court disagree?? I haven't read their ruling on why they think checkpoints are legal.
On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 3:28 PM, Judah McAuley <[email protected]> wrote: > > I agree with you that DUI is (and should be) a crime regardless of whether > there is an accident. Driving is a privilege and you've violated the > compact you agreed to when getting your license if you drive under the > influence. > > I strongly disagree, however, with any legal fishing expeditions that try > to find guilt without probable cause. That covers DUI checkpoints, stop and > frisk, warrantless wiretapping...the list goes on and on. To me, it is a > fundamental tenant of our society. I understand that others feel > differently. > > Cheers, > Judah > > > On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 12:20 PM, Scott Stroz <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > I support basic rights. > > > > I don't think DUI checkpoints violate mine (or anyone else's) rights. > > > > Still bothered by Tim's implication that it is not a crime to drive under > > the influence until/unless there is an accident. > > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:365400 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
