I agree with you that DUI is (and should be) a crime regardless of whether there is an accident. Driving is a privilege and you've violated the compact you agreed to when getting your license if you drive under the influence.
I strongly disagree, however, with any legal fishing expeditions that try to find guilt without probable cause. That covers DUI checkpoints, stop and frisk, warrantless wiretapping...the list goes on and on. To me, it is a fundamental tenant of our society. I understand that others feel differently. Cheers, Judah On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 12:20 PM, Scott Stroz <[email protected]> wrote: > > I support basic rights. > > I don't think DUI checkpoints violate mine (or anyone else's) rights. > > Still bothered by Tim's implication that it is not a crime to drive under > the influence until/unless there is an accident. > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:365387 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
