The kid wasn't a terrorist. He wasn't radicalized. The two family members
who were had been killed two weeks before.

At a minimum is a due process issue.
On Oct 15, 2013 5:44 PM, "Justin Scott" <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> > Obama ordered a drone strike targeting and killing a US citizen, Anwar
> > al-Awlaki. His son (who was 16) was also killed is a subsequent drone
> > strike but it is not clear that he was specifically targeted. Eric Holder
> > has publicly admitted that al-Awlaki was targeted and that they knew he
> was
> > a citizen. His citizenship was never revoked. The administration
> justified
> > it under rules of war being conducted on foreign soil.
>
> Citizen or not, I think he'd have a pretty good defense if this was
> the basis for impeachment.  After all, government representatives kill
> US Citizens all the time when they present an imminent danger to the
> public (e.g. police officers kill Citizens in the line of duty all the
> time).  I'd say that directly assisting a terrorist organization with
> the goal of planning and executing terrorist attacks qualifies as
> presenting an imminent danger.  The argument that others are bringing
> up about holding him responsible for defaulting on the debt is more
> complex and I don't fully understand how that works, but even that
> sounds more plausible than taking out a terrorist (citizen or not).
>
>
> -Justin
>
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:367789
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm

Reply via email to