There are laws against this for a reason. The United States is *supposed* to be comprised of semi-independent States. The Federal governent is not supposed to impose federal troops in States - States are supposed to police themselves...
Sorry, but I find it scary that Shrub & Company are doing everything they possibly can to revole freedoms under the guise of "fighting terrorism". The Military has a scope and so do law enforcement agencies...I think they should retain their current roles... Howie ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bill Wheatley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 3:25 PM Subject: Re: Welcome to the Junta > What is scary about it? IF there is a state of martial law declared the > military can do just that. > > But I don't see why letting the military ACT as law enforcement at times is > scary besides the fact they are trained as soldiers and not law enforcement, > unless they only used MP's or SP's which I doubt. Its not saying using the > military in police actions would mean its the same as martial law where you > loose all your rights and guarantees. I'm sure you would still have the same > protections and hell if they screw up you can sue the army ;) well you could > try. > > Using a broken keyboard for a bettter tomorrow :P > > > Bill Wheatley > Senior Database Developer > Macromedia Certified Advanced Coldfusion Developer > EDIETS.COM > 954.360.9022 X159 > ICQ 417645 ______________________________________________________________________ This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for dependable ColdFusion Hosting. Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
