oi Dana!!

had  the  same  thing  this  morning....dunno the addy though...I just bounced the 
email back to em.
*boing*




------------------------------------
Thursday, June 26, 2003, 12:27:00 PM, you wrote:

DT> Ahem. AOL emailed me the sobig.e virus according to my Norton antivirus. 
DT> The email has an attachment labeled your_details.zip, which is per the 
DT> specs for this virus. Naturally I did not open it. But the email is not 
DT> from [EMAIL PROTECTED]; the email is *from* AOL saying my email to her was not 
DT> delivered because it has a virus. Which they helpfully included for 
DT> reference. Now, from the top, this virus claims to be from people who are 
DT> also in the address book of the original sender. I do not know ruthj and 
DT> she is not in my address book, and I don't have this virus because norton 
DT> caught it in this email that AOL sent me.

DT> God I hate it when you patronize me, especially when you usually don't have 
DT> a good grasp of what is going on when you do it.

DT> Dana

DT> On Thu, 26 Jun 2003 12:18:19 -0400, William Wheatley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
DT> wrote:

>> That doesn't say aol sent you a virus that says whoever mailed that ruth
>> person has a virus that was in their email and they had better fix it.
>>
>> But either way aol is evil.
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dana Tierney" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 12:12 PM
>> Subject: Re: how stupid
>>
>>
>>> the AOL user didnt send me the virus. AOL did. I got the following, with
>>> the virus as an attachment.
>>>
>>> The original message was received at Thu, 26 Jun 2003 06:09:09 -0400 
>>> (EDT)
>>> from  [66.72.7.21]
>>>
>>> *** ATTENTION ***
>>> Your e-mail is being returned to you because there was a problem with 
>>> its
>>> delivery.  The address which was undeliverable is listed in the section
>>> labeled: "----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors ----- 
>>> ".
>>> The reason your mail is being returned to you is listed in the section
>>> labeled: "----- Transcript of Session Follows -----".
>>> The line beginning with "<<<" describes the specific reason your e-mail
>>> could
>>> not be delivered.  The next line contains a second error message which 
>>> is
>> a
>>> general translation for other e-mail servers.
>>> Please direct further questions regarding this message to your e-mail
>>> administrator.
>>> --AOL Postmaster
>>>
>>>
>>> ----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> ----- Transcript of session follows -----
>>> ... while talking to air-xm03.mail.aol.com.:
>>> >>> DATA
>>> <<< 554 TRANSACTION FAILED - Unrepairable Virus Detected. Your mail has
>> not
>>> been sent.
>>> 554 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... Service unavailable
>>>
>>> On Thu, 26 Jun 2003 10:59:06 -0500, Matt Blatchley ~ Bridgeleaf Studios
>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>> > Dana,
>>> >
>>> > I run into similar issues with AOL users.  I have a few clients who
>>> > refuse
>>> > to use the email addresses I setup for them and they send me virus's 
>>> too
>>> > stating I sent it to them.  Big pain in the ass because I've requested 
>>> a
>>> > response from the folks at AOL, but like you said, the level of 
>>> response
>>> > is
>>> > by someone part time and doesn't give two shiznitz about anyone other
>>> > than
>>> > their own customers, and that's only if they bitch consistently.  I'd
>>> > love
>>> > to rant about them two, but I'll spare the rest of the list my opinion
>> on
>>> > that issue seeing as how they can all assume my feelings on that one
>>> > anyway.
>>> > I feel for ya!
>>> >
>>> > Matt
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > -----Original Message-----
>>> > From: Dana Tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> > Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 10:34 AM
>>> > To: CF-Community
>>> > Subject: how stupid
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > (rant)
>>> > I was complaining yesterday about getting a little notice scolding me
>> for
>>> > allegedly sending a virus to somebody I don't know in Finland. The 
>>> virus
>>> > in
>>> > question puts names from the true sender's address book in the "from"
>>> > field, but apparently the system in question is not set up to check ip
>>> > addresses.
>>> >
>>> > I ran an extra virus scan last night to be sure, and no, I don't have
>>> > this
>>> > virus. I would not expect to as my virus software scans incoming mail.
>>> >
>>> > This scan works, as demonstrated by the fact that this morning it 
>>> warned
>>> > me
>>> > that someone emailed me a virus. Come to find out it is AOL, 
>>> complaining
>>> > that I sent this virus to [EMAIL PROTECTED], whom I do not know.
>>> >
>>> > The truly astounding thing is that *they mailed the virus to me* -- is
>>> > that
>>> > supposed to prove something? What if I did not in fact have up to date
>>> > software? I used to work at AOL so I am well past expecting 
>>> intelligence
>>> > from them, but geez, this practice is a threat to the health of the
>>> > internet. Too bad it doesn't have a WHO.
>>> >
>>> > (end rant)
>>> > Dana
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > Mr Jones and me
>>> > We're stumbling through the barrio....
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>> 
DT> 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=5
Subscription: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=5

This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for 
dependable ColdFusion Hosting.
http://www.cfhosting.com

                                Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
                                

Reply via email to