ahh, but relevency is in the eye of the beholder, no?

will



Deanna Schneider wrote:

>I think the rub lies in the fact that the bible says a lot of things that no
>one follows. I read a really good article about it once, which I, of course,
>can't find now. But, it basically went through all the things that people
>couldn't do, or would have to do, if the bible was followed verbatim. The
>point was that the bible was written a long time ago and parts of it are
>accepted as no longer relevant. So, who's to say that the edicts against
>homosexuality are any more relevant than these other things deemed
>irrelevant now.
>
>-d
>
>
>----- Original Message ----- 
>From: "Heald, Tim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 2:36 PM
>Subject: RE: Yet another scumbag parent....
>
>
>  
>
>>Umm I said catholic where?
>>
>>If they want to say yes more power.  I guess they haven't read the bible,
>>but so be it.
>>
>>BTW I am a recently converted atheist, after being one of those flaky feel
>>good pagan types.  I don't want it to be misunderstood.  I do not believe
>>what the book says, but if you claim it...........
>>
>>Timothy Heald
>>Information Systems Specialist
>>Overseas Security Advisory Council
>>U.S. Department of State
>>571.345.2235
>>
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Kevin Graeme [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 3:32 PM
>>To: CF-Community
>>Subject: RE: Yet another scumbag parent....
>>
>>
>>In this particular case, it's the Episcopalian Church that was about to
>>explicitly say "yes" to a gay bishop. Different Church than if he was
>>Catholic.
>>
>>    
>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: Heald, Tim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 1:49 PM
>>>To: CF-Community
>>>Subject: RE: Yet another scumbag parent....
>>>
>>>
>>>Wait. I have no problem with anyone based on sexual
>>>preference, however, how can one claim to be a "Christian"
>>>after the bible says sodomy is a no go, and god killed a
>>>bunch of those that practiced it?  Not to mention is the
>>>church free to make whatever bylaws it wants?  Shouldn't they
>>>be able to say no gay ministers?  I mean the military still
>>>does and that's a government institution.
>>>
>>>Timothy Heald
>>>Information Systems Specialist
>>>Overseas Security Advisory Council
>>>U.S. Department of State
>>>571.345.2235
>>>
>>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: Larry C. Lyons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 2:40 PM
>>>To: CF-Community
>>>Subject: Re: Yet another scumbag parent....
>>>
>>>
>>>Isn't that what's happening now, i.e., Laramie Wyoming and
>>>the most recent
>>>election fiasco with the Episcopalian Church.
>>>
>>>larry
>>>
>>>At 01:33 PM 8/5/2003 -0500, Doug White wrote:
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>>>If we decriminalized these so-called crimes what would be
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>left for the
>>>      
>>>
>>>>right-wing to do?  Gang up on the homos?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>    
>>
>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=5
Subscription: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=5

Get the mailserver that powers this list at 
http://www.coolfusion.com

                                Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
                                

Reply via email to