My point exactly. ----- Original Message ----- From: "William H Bowen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 3:28 PM Subject: Re: Yet another scumbag parent....
> ahh, but relevency is in the eye of the beholder, no? > > will > > > > Deanna Schneider wrote: > > >I think the rub lies in the fact that the bible says a lot of things that no > >one follows. I read a really good article about it once, which I, of course, > >can't find now. But, it basically went through all the things that people > >couldn't do, or would have to do, if the bible was followed verbatim. The > >point was that the bible was written a long time ago and parts of it are > >accepted as no longer relevant. So, who's to say that the edicts against > >homosexuality are any more relevant than these other things deemed > >irrelevant now. > > > >-d > > > > > >----- Original Message ----- > >From: "Heald, Tim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 2:36 PM > >Subject: RE: Yet another scumbag parent.... > > > > > > > > > >>Umm I said catholic where? > >> > >>If they want to say yes more power. I guess they haven't read the bible, > >>but so be it. > >> > >>BTW I am a recently converted atheist, after being one of those flaky feel > >>good pagan types. I don't want it to be misunderstood. I do not believe > >>what the book says, but if you claim it........... > >> > >>Timothy Heald > >>Information Systems Specialist > >>Overseas Security Advisory Council > >>U.S. Department of State > >>571.345.2235 > >> > >> > >>-----Original Message----- > >>From: Kevin Graeme [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 3:32 PM > >>To: CF-Community > >>Subject: RE: Yet another scumbag parent.... > >> > >> > >>In this particular case, it's the Episcopalian Church that was about to > >>explicitly say "yes" to a gay bishop. Different Church than if he was > >>Catholic. > >> > >> > >> > >>>-----Original Message----- > >>>From: Heald, Tim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 1:49 PM > >>>To: CF-Community > >>>Subject: RE: Yet another scumbag parent.... > >>> > >>> > >>>Wait. I have no problem with anyone based on sexual > >>>preference, however, how can one claim to be a "Christian" > >>>after the bible says sodomy is a no go, and god killed a > >>>bunch of those that practiced it? Not to mention is the > >>>church free to make whatever bylaws it wants? Shouldn't they > >>>be able to say no gay ministers? I mean the military still > >>>does and that's a government institution. > >>> > >>>Timothy Heald > >>>Information Systems Specialist > >>>Overseas Security Advisory Council > >>>U.S. Department of State > >>>571.345.2235 > >>> > >>> > >>>-----Original Message----- > >>>From: Larry C. Lyons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 2:40 PM > >>>To: CF-Community > >>>Subject: Re: Yet another scumbag parent.... > >>> > >>> > >>>Isn't that what's happening now, i.e., Laramie Wyoming and > >>>the most recent > >>>election fiasco with the Episcopalian Church. > >>> > >>>larry > >>> > >>>At 01:33 PM 8/5/2003 -0500, Doug White wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>>If we decriminalized these so-called crimes what would be > >>>> > >>>> > >>>left for the > >>> > >>> > >>>>right-wing to do? Gang up on the homos? > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=5 Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
