Oh I liked it. It just needed a lot of editing. It does beg for a series.
Hatch must be praying to every god known right now.

-Kevin (I still want to punch the butterfly.)

----- Original Message -----
From: "Tim Heald" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 10:18 PM
Subject: RE: Battlestar Galactica

> I liked it.  Good twist at the end.
>
> Damn I hope they bring it back as a series.
>   -----Original Message-----
>   From: Kevin Graeme [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>   Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 11:14 PM
>   To: CF-Community
>   Subject: Re: Battlestar Galactica
>
>
>   Dammit. I give them the benefit of the doubt and then they give me
that?!?
>
>   Can you say "vehicle for AOL vs. MSN ads?" I wanted to punch that damn
>   butterfly.
>
>   Okay. Really. I still stand by what I said before about what I liked.
But
>   the whole damn thing could have been an hour long, 1:30 at most, and it
>   still would have had all the good stuff.
>
>   I hate miniseries writers.
>
>   -Kevin
>
>   ----- Original Message -----
>   From: "Heald, Tim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>   To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>   Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 8:21 AM
>   Subject: RE: Battlestar Galactica
>
>   > I'm with you man.  Good so far.  Can't wait for part two.  I wonder if
>   maybe
>   > this isn't just a test case to see how it works as a series?
>   >
>   >
>   > --
>   > Timothy Heald
>   > Web Portfolio Manager
>   > Overseas Security Advisory Council
>   > U.S. Department of State
>   > 571.345.2319
>   >
>   > The opinions expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of the
U.S.
>   > Department of State or any affiliated organization(s).  Nor have these
>   > opinions been approved or sanctioned by these organizations. This
e-mail
>   is
>   > unclassified based on the definitions in E.O. 12958.
>   >
>   > -----Original Message-----
>   > From: John Stanley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>   > Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 9:23 AM
>   > To: CF-Community
>   > Subject: RE: Battlestar Galactica
>   >
>   >
>   > I was pleasantly suprised as well by the first part, and am looking
>   forward
>   > to the second half. it makes me wonder how they can complete the story
> in
>   > just two hours, when they went as slow as they did in the first half.
>   >
>   > -----Original Message-----
>   > From: Kevin Graeme [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>   > Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 9:19 AM
>   > To: CF-Community
>   > Subject: Re: Battlestar Galactica
>   >
>   > Details? Ha! I sent the message and then went to bed.
>   >
>   > It was shown twice again last night and will be shown again tonight
> before
>   > the second part. And it's on again this Sunday. So I'm not going to
say
>   > anything about the plot itself. It's a two-parter and while I was
> pleased
>   > with it, that's because I thought it was going to be crash and burn
>   > sucktackular.
>   >
>   > Spoilers?
>   > .
>   > .
>   > .
>   > .
>   > .
>   > .
>   > .
>   > .
>   > .
>   > .
>   > .
>   > IMO, they more than adequately addressed the stylistic differences
> between
>   > the original and this series. In fact, I think it was a damn fine
> cop-out.
>   > The first shot of Galactica came in at that rear three quarters angle
> with
>   > odd optical lens distortion that was part of the original show, and
> later
>   in
>   > the show there's even a bit of the original theme music. The show
picks
> up
>   > 20 years after the first Cylon wars. Technology has progressed. The
>   > Galactica is an aging vessel and about to be decomissioned. It's used
>   > primarily as a tourist exhibit and there's a gift shop and museum
> display
>   in
>   > one of the hangers. In the museum they have an old Cylon in a glass
case
>   and
>   > old Vipers on display. The old equipment though is going to be the
> saving
>   > grace against the Cylons and their new ability to affect networked
>   computer
>   > systems.
>   >
>   > The evil Cylon woman is sexxay. Olmos as Adama is haggard and
gravelly.
>   He's
>   > looking old, but his character is supposed to. Starbuck is fine as a
> woman
>   > (I got over that kind of problem 15 years ago when I saw a stage
>   production
>   > of Romeo and Juliet with Mercutio played by an asian woman), but her
>   > tremulous first line left me wondering if she was going to be a strong
>   > enough character. She makes up for it later.
>   >
>   > My only complaint? It's fucking SLOW. Why is it that when you have a
TV
>   > miniseries it automatically means that it's going to be waaaaaay too
> much
>   > exposition? The whole 2 hours was basically initial character
> development.
>   > Sure some stuff happened, but it was just to set up the second
episode.
> I
>   > hope.
>   >
>   > -Kevin
>   >
>   > ----- Original Message -----
>   > From: "Haggerty, Mike" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>   > To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>   > Sent: Monday, December 08, 2003 10:50 PM
>   > Subject: RE: Battlestar Galactica
>   >
>   > > Details.... some of us are still working.
>   > >
>   > > M
>   > >
>   > > -----Original Message-----
>   > > From: Kevin Graeme [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>   > > Sent: Mon 12/8/2003 11:15 PM
>   > > To: CF-Community
>   > > Cc:
>   > > Subject: Re: Battlestar Galactica
>   > >
>   > >
>   > > Yay! It doesn't suck! Yay I say!
>   > >
>   > > -Kevin
>   > >   _____
>   > >
>   > >
>   > >
>   >   _____
>   >   _____
>   >
>   >
>   >
>
>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]

Reply via email to