Dear @AndersMS. Daniel @erget et al., > Concerning terminology, following discussion in the group, these terms seem > good candidates:
> At tie-point level: "subsampled dimension", "non-interpolated dimension" > At reconstituted level: "interpolated dimension", "non-interpolated dimension" Yes, that terminology seems clear and self-explanatory to me. Thanks for your patience and carefulness. > Actionees! I take on myself an action to review the rest of the proposal (Appendix and conformance document) this week. Best wishes Jonathan -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://urldefense.us/v3/__https://github.com/cf-convention/cf-conventions/issues/327*issuecomment-871248157__;Iw!!G2kpM7uM-TzIFchu!gsxrOv2ysX6OgZprPT0fXVbdQLwq41YWHk6IHGuWuMSd8cWalg1hnnCaipIGE1BuDEpqgqKegaM$ This list forwards relevant notifications from Github. It is distinct from [email protected], although if you do nothing, a subscription to the UCAR list will result in a subscription to this list. To unsubscribe from this list only, send a message to [email protected].
