@oceandatalab (Sylvain) & @AndersMS - I am in favour of the shorter text; in fact, perhaps one could combine these 3 paragraphs into 1:
> The accuracy of the reconstituted coordinates will mainly depend on the > degree of subsampling, the choice of interpolation method and the choice of > the floating-point arithmetic precision used in the interpolation method > computations. > > The accuracy of the reconstituted coordinates may also depend on details of > the interpolation method implementation and on the computer platform, meaning > that the results of the coordinate reconstitution process may not be fully > reproducible. > > However, to enable the data user to reconstitute the coordinates to an > accuracy comparable to the accuracy intended by the data creator, the data > creator shall specify the floating-point arithmetic precision used during the > preparation and validation of the compressed coordinates by setting the > interpolation variable’s computational_precision attribute to one of the > following values: Please understand that as a suggestion from my side - if you feel the 3 paragraphs are better I wouldn't feel strongly enough to call the CF police. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://urldefense.us/v3/__https://github.com/cf-convention/cf-conventions/issues/327*issuecomment-873066613__;Iw!!G2kpM7uM-TzIFchu!mph7ZtWT4IPNt5iXN5MYqhLj7CW3nMR6nAZvfhMvYvYRthrYCW7AXtyR7K2x5NTMNooEr9vWDOU$ This list forwards relevant notifications from Github. It is distinct from [email protected], although if you do nothing, a subscription to the UCAR list will result in a subscription to this list. To unsubscribe from this list only, send a message to [email protected].
