>>That is anti-trust law and not patent. Nope, if the patent owner does not grant ANY licence, there is no matter for anti-trust law, where is the "trust"? Antitrust Law is when one does something, takes advantage of it and prevents others from doing business. If he does not do any business with his patent, he does not take advantage of it
>>If the patent was licensed to some browser vendors, but not others --namely >>Microsoft Then obviously it would'nt be a case of "licensing refusal", which was what we were talking about. However, it would be a damned proof of stupidity, considering the part of the market ;-) ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm?link=t:4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm?link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4 Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com
