>> There are other factors that one needs to think about >> when writing an >> application. Think about the ability to use Threads in >> .NET. Depending >> on your application, sitting and processing 10 requests >> back to back may >> take 5 minutes but if you had the ability to run the 10 >> tasks >> concurrently you may be able to respond back to the >> customer in 30 >> seconds.
> First, asynchronous processing isn't that common in web > applications. > Second, you can use asynchronous processing in CFMX > applications now, by > hooking to JMS - it's not easy or trivial, but it can be > done. Third, I've > heard that Blackstone will provide an easier way to do > asynchronous > processing. If that's true, why would you complain about > Blackstone not > providing what you need? I believe it's a built-in async.cfc which can be extended to perform asynchronous tasks... I haven't had a chance to look into it yet -- I've been too busy working on the framework recently, adding xml templating and built-in i18n features, but I've heard it's very impressive. s. isaac dealey 954.927.5117 new epoch : isn't it time for a change? add features without fixtures with the onTap open source framework http://www.sys-con.com/story/?storyid=44477&DE=1 http://www.sys-con.com/story/?storyid=45569&DE=1 http://www.fusiontap.com ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Special thanks to the CF Community Suite Silver Sponsor - CFDynamics http://www.cfdynamics.com Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:187298 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
