sure :) We all know how I feel about ms, I certainly don't hide it and they have pissed me off enough that I will never go back to a windows platform and quite frankly after spending a day on a mac there is no reason why I would even want to and shorthorn isn't going to change that, since i am pretty sure all they are really doing is changing the icons ;) It will still be built opun the chicago code base which really just means the problems wont stop.
So anyways..... I haven't tried mono yet, maybe Sean or someone who has experience with it can chime in on how it runs but if it runs ok then yeah I certainly would concider it :) I know how hard you guys have worked on it, just because I hate ms doesn't mean I won't support any of you here who do support them, I'd rather support the community members over someone else. " I'm certainly not criticizing your preferences; I'm only trying to understand them" To be frank, a OS X kicks the living shit outta any windows based OS, period! I can actually work on a mac and not spend half my day, cleaning, scanning, rebooting, cursing, kicking, flipping off, mooning, bugger wiping ........... Haven't you guys noticed my moods been so much better, since I switched? It will be curious to see how and what will run on a mac once the intel chips start coming round, so I dunno about how you can plan to have it on a mac in the future. But the plum tool itself I like but I would concider other options to the .net platform as OS X is getting rolling. I'd even recommend that you get on the Apple Developers deal where they send you the equiptment to be able to start porting things to the new mac/intel platform. But if you do it, I will definately help you test it out :) ~Dave the disruptor~ "A criminal is a person with predatory instincts who has not sufficient capital to form a corporation." ---------------------------------------- From: "Adam Churvis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2005 6:04 PM To: CF-Talk <[email protected]> Subject: Re: mach II or fusebox? Thanks for the feedback, Dave. Some other anti-MS folks have said the same thing. How would you feel if we could get Plum working with MySQL under Mono? I don't know how compatible it will be with Mono, but that won't matter if there is still political resentment over Plum being built using the .NET Framework. I'm certainly not criticizing your preferences; I'm only trying to understand them (which I assume are similar to many other people's preferences) so we can try to make Plum better for more people. And also, thanks for your help during the Beta testing. Very helpful to all, and very much appreciated. Respectfully, Adam Phillip Churvis Member of Team Macromedia http://www.ProductivityEnhancement.com Download Plum and other cool development tools, and get advanced intensive Master-level training: * C# & ASP.NET for ColdFusion Developers * ColdFusion MX Master Class * Advanced Development with CFMX and SQL Server 2000 ----- Original Message ----- From: "dave" To: "CF-Talk" Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2005 5:42 PM Subject: Re: mach II or fusebox? > Adam, I loved Plum when I was on beta but.......................... > > things changed and it wasn't anything plum did it was just the lack of support for mysql (as i graduated up a notch from access) but its also built upon .net framework and gawd 4 bid I will EVER have anything m$ on my machines ever again! (MacTel baby!!)(on pc that is, mac office is pretty damn nice, way nicer than pc), so thats limiting a few ppl as well and I can only see that as becoming more prevelent in the future. But I certainly won't turn on the "disaster magnet" aka pc just to run a framework. > > Personally, I would rather support Isaac or Joe for their hard work than to use either mach II or fusebox. > > ~Dave the disruptor~ > "A criminal is a person with predatory instincts who has not sufficient capital to form a corporation." > > ---------------------------------------- > From: "Adam Churvis" > Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2005 7:51 AM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: Re: mach II or fusebox? > > > no, because plum is limited to ms sql and I would like something a lil bit > more main frain then onTap for what I will be using it for. > > Right now Plum supports MS SQL, Oracle 9i and above, and MS Access. We're > going to be adding MySql and PostGreSQL in the future. > > We really should have launched with MySQL support from the beginning, but it > would have delayed the launch date significantly, so we decided to go with > the "Big Three." It's no problem for the Plum Framework and generated code > to handle different platforms; it's building communication support for those > platforms into the IDE and getting complicated functionality like DB > synchronization to work properly with different platforms' system catalogs, > etc. > > What version of MySQL do you mainly use? We may need to support MySQL 5.0.2 > or higher, which is why I ask. > > Respectfully, > > Adam Phillip Churvis > Member of Team Macromedia > http://www.ProductivityEnhancement.com > > Download Plum and other cool development tools, > and get advanced intensive Master-level training: > > * C# & ASP.NET for ColdFusion Developers > * ColdFusion MX Master Class > * Advanced Development with CFMX and SQL Server 2000 > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support efficiency by 100% http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:209754 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
