What are we actually debating, again? The original issue at the root of all this was that Adobe is being "abusive" to the OSS engines. Highlighting the competitive advantages that Adobe feels they have over Railo or OpenBD, or the negative impact they feel it those engines have on the Adobe or CF community, is not abuse. It is exactly what competitors do. Everyone is free to agree or disagree with what Adobe is saying. But to call it "abuse" reveals, at best, a lack of understanding of what the word means, and at worst, an intentional misrepresentation.
I keep asking for some examples of the horrible abuse that Adobe (or anyone, really) are directing at the OSS engines, but no one seems to be bothering to provide any. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:341744 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm
