thanks for your advice re flex however 12,000 for it is out of the question
one man operations like myself would never be in a position to spend that
amount of money

I guess I am back to trying to find tutorials re flash which are very hard
to find for novice flash newbies like myself compared to the plethora of
tutorial information available for cf

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Andrew
Muller
Sent: Tuesday, 4 May 2004 1:39 PM
To: CFAussie Mailing List
Subject: [cfaussie] Re: Cold Fusion vs ASP


Barry

I've recently done some ActionScript application development training
for a corporate who sees the AUD$18000 ($12000 is the USD price) for
Flex a very good alternative for an existing enterprise solution they're
using that's worth about double the price.

Everything is relative...

Andrew

Barry Beattie wrote:

>
> How much is that "ease" worth to you - $12,000 for the licence?
>
> yeah, I also think it's a damn shame but I can't see MM changing it's
> pricing strategy. There's been a hell of a lot of negative sentiment
> about the $$$ already.
>
> I was keen as but I'm not even bothering to learn it because I can't see
> enough market share to justify the training hours.
>
>
>>>is Macromedia aware of the opportunity to separately sell (at more
>
> reasonable price) the MXML compiler as a new tool?
>
> I'm sure they're very aware. it'd kill proper FLEX sales left and
> center.
>
> perhaps there will be some *worthwhile* FLEX functionality in
> blackstone? then it'd really piss all over ASP.NET (to bring it back to
> the original thread)
>
> just my $0.02 worth
> barry.b
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chris Velevitch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, 4 May 2004 11:37 AM
> To: CFAussie Mailing List
> Subject: [cfaussie] Re: Cold Fusion vs ASP
>
> On Fri, 30 Apr 2004 10:06:57 -0700, Sean A Corfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
>
>>Macromedia made it pretty clear from day one that Flex was aimed at
>>enterprise application developer teams (in particular, Java developer
>
>
> That's a fine strategy for developing business in a new market. But the
> problem is, Macromedia has reinvented Flash, basically making more
> attractive for existing developers who currently use Macromedia tools.
> Macromedia has given us another, easier and similar, way to create swf
> files. And at this stage of the game, all I want is the MXML compiler to
>
> generate swfs instead of using the Flash IDE.
>
> I appreciate that Flex allows you to dynamically generate swf files, and
> I
> can imagine the impact that'll have on what you can do with an RIA. But
> I
> need to statically generate swf files and MXML makes that whole process
> easier.
>
>
> Chris
>
> ---
> You are currently subscribed to cfaussie as: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> MXDU2004 + Macromedia DevCon AsiaPac + Sydney, Australia
> http://www.mxdu.com/ + 24-25 February, 2004
>
>
>

--
Andrew Muller
Senior Macromedia Certified Instructor - ColdFusion, Flash
Macromedia Certified Developer - ColdFusion, Flash
NSW CFUG Manager

Daemon Internet Consultants - http://www.daemon.com.au/training
17 Roslyn Gardens
Elizabeth Bay NSW 2011 AUSTRALIA
T:61 2 9380 4162
F:61 2 9380 4204

Daemon: Serious Web Development


MXDU: The AsiaPac Macromedia Devcon
http://www.mxdu.com/

---
You are currently subscribed to cfaussie as:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe send a blank email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

MXDU2004 + Macromedia DevCon AsiaPac + Sydney, Australia
http://www.mxdu.com/ + 24-25 February, 2004



---
You are currently subscribed to cfaussie as: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

MXDU2004 + Macromedia DevCon AsiaPac + Sydney, Australia
http://www.mxdu.com/ + 24-25 February, 2004

Reply via email to