Bummer. :( Think you're going to have to tell them they're dreaming then, 
because as far as I've ever been able to tell, the two are mutually exclusive: 
pixel-perfect across browsers and still accessible just doesn't seem to be 
feasible.


Seona.

Quoting "KNOTT, Brian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

> I would be happy with looking good but the client is not.  They have a
> mixture of IE 5.5 and IE6.  They have noticed the differences and want them
> to look the same.
> 
> Brian
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Seona Bellamy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Thursday, 16 June 2005 11:50 AM
> To: CFAussie Mailing List
> Subject: [cfaussie] Re: OT CSS
> 
> > What I trying to find is a style sheet solution that looks the same in IE
> > 5.5 and IE 6 but does not use fixed size.  That's where the em's come into
> > it, but I having problems getting em's and sizes like smaller to work.
> > 
> > Brian
> 
> Something you may want to consider:
> 
> How many people, aside from the ones involved in the development of the
> site, 
> are going to open your page in multiple browsers and sit them side by side
> to 
> compare the results? For users, they open whatever is their preferred (or 
> enforced) browser and browse your page in that. End of story.
> 
> The only people likely to be browser hopping are other developers if you ask
> 
> them to site check for you. If you're asking them, it's probably because
> they 
> know what they're doing. In that case, they most likely understand and 
> appreciate that different browsers render relative font sizes slightly 
> differently. 
> 
> My advice to you would be to ask a different question when you look at the 
> page. Instead of asking "Does the page look pixel-perfectly identical in all
> 
> browsers?" you should ask "Does this page look okay in this browser?" for
> each 
> browser you test in. As long as the text is readable and isn't breaking your
> 
> layout, it's okay if it doesn't look exactly the same as in another browser.
> 
> Pixel-perfection and accessibility just don't seem to mix.
> 
> Just my take on the subject, anyway. :)
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Seona.
> 
> ---
> You are currently subscribed to cfaussie as: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Aussie Macromedia Developers: http://lists.daemon.com.au/
> 
> 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----
> This e-mail is sent by Suncorp-Metway Limited ABN 66 010 831 722 or one of
> its related entities "Suncorp". 
> 
> Suncorp may be contacted at Level 18, 36 Wickham Terrace, Brisbane or on 13
> 11 55  or at suncorp.com.au.
> 
> The content of this e-mail is the view of the sender or stated author and
> does not necessarily reflect the view of Suncorp. The content, including
> attachments, is a confidential communication between Suncorp and the 
intended
> recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, any use, interference 
with,
> disclosure or copying of this e-mail, including attachments, is unauthorised
> and expressly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please
> contact the sender immediately and delete the e-mail and any attachments 
from
> your system.
> 
> If this e-mail constitutes a commercial message of a type that you no longer
> wish to receive please reply to this e-mail by typing Unsubscribe in the
> subject line.
> 
> 
> ---
> You are currently subscribed to cfaussie as: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Aussie Macromedia Developers: http://lists.daemon.com.au/
> 



---
You are currently subscribed to cfaussie as: [email protected]
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aussie Macromedia Developers: http://lists.daemon.com.au/

Reply via email to