Title: Message

Looks like the archive isn’t very old, so it doesn’t contain the threads to which I refer. I hate to beat a dead horse, so I will just leave my statement as it is. I’m sure someone will disagree and the subject will be revived yet again.

Matt Liotta
President & CEO
Montara Software, Inc.
http://www.montarasoftware.com/
888-408-0900 x901

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Davis, Eric
Sent: Monday, March 24, 2003 3:20 PM
To: '
[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [CFCDev] MVCF at benorama.com

 

The only archives I've found, thanks to Nat, are those at mail-archive.com - where would there be archives of these scalability issues?

 

 

--
Eric C. Davis
Programmer/Analyst I
Georgia Department of Transportation
Office of I.T. Applications
404.463.2860.158
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-----Original Message-----
From: Matt Liotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 24, 2003 3:01 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [CFCDev] MVCF at benorama.com

The testing I have conducted shows that the using CFCs as models in an MVC pattern will not scale without serious hacks. It is possible that a framework will emerge that provides these hacks, but I haven't seen any as of yet. Please look to the archives of this list for discussion of these scalability issues.

 

Matt Liotta
President & CEO
Montara Software, Inc.
http://www.montarasoftware.com/
888-408-0900 x901

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Davis, Eric
Sent: Monday, March 24, 2003 1:55 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [CFCDev] MVCF at benorama.com

 

Link: <http://www.benorama.com/coldfusion/>
Word ver.: <http://www.benorama.com/coldfusion/patterns/MVCF.doc>

Has anyone looked really hard at this one? What are everybody's thoughts on this?

I'm looking for a replacement to Fusebox 3 for MX - FBMX is too slow coming, and probably won't make much sense anyway (I'm guessing it'll be quite obfuscatory and rather difficult to implement the first five to ten times).

He's put together quite a presentation, and he about has me convinced, if only I can simplify the structure a bit. I'm trying to find the right methodology for my team here to use, and they're NONE of them big methodology-users.

Anyway, just haven't seen any threads about this, and wondered if you folks had anything to say on the subject.

Which of course you must; you always do. ;)

Thanks,
ecd.

--
Eric C. Davis
Programmer/Analyst I
Georgia Department of Transportation
Office of I.T. Applications
404.463.2860.158
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to