I've been using MG for a few years now, I'm definitely going to be choosing CB for my next application, I am quite tired of even having to think of expressing complex stuff via XML in MG when I know it can also be achieved quite simply in CFML.
for me it's just been the case of working on existing projects holding me back from getting stuck into something new with CB. The documentation is great for CB and I'm looking forward to using the event tracing stuff I suggested which got added in a while ago... basically it tracks changes in your request collection been event handlers z On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 2:59 AM, John Whish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > XML syntax in any framework takes a bit of getting used to. Where Fusebox no > XML, ColdBox, OnTap and CFWheels are good is that they all use Convention > over Configuration (although you can override it) which generally makes it > easier to learn. Bottom line, if it does what you want well - it's the > framework for you :) > > > > -- Zac Spitzer - http://zacster.blogspot.com (My Blog) +61 405 847 168 --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CFCDev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfcdev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
