It's been conveyed to me that I am presenting an attitude of disdain for all non-Fusebox users. While I think there is certainly a misperception at work here, I wanted to make sure that everyone knew where I was coming from. Framework choice is as personal as the kind of underwear you buy, seriously... my only intention has been to present factual corrections where it seemed that they were needed based on what folks were saying.
Honestly, I never meant to turn the "what do y'all think about ColdBox thread into a Fusebox love (or hate) fest, either. My bad, honestly. So if I gave any indication of disdain for non-Fusebox users, it was not my intention. In fact, I sincerely think that the current crop of CFML front-end frameworks are about equal both in terms of what they provide and what they don't, what doesn't work well and what does, and whether or not they have any shortcomings... so I don't really have an opinion on which is better. To me, they're all just different variations on a theme. I never intended to bash ColdBox (in all honestly, I still don't think I actually did), nor did I ever intend to suggest that the only viable framework to use was Fusebox (which I don't think I actually did either). Just wanted to make sure that was all clear. Laterz, J On Oct 20, 2008, at 11:36 AM, Zac Spitzer wrote: > > I've been using MG for a few years now, I'm definitely going to be > choosing CB > for my next application, ... --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CFCDev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfcdev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
