from: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saying

   Aphorism. A concise definition, notably memorable.
   Adage. An aphorism that has gained credibility by virtue of long use.

Is it possible that we are looking for 'adage' here?

 - michael dykman

On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 2:07 PM, Roger Hui <[email protected]> wrote:
> In natural languages, a phrase book would be quite
> a different thing from a book of aphorisms.
> A phrase book would contain practically useful items
> like "Excuse me, where is the nearest toilet",
> whereas an aphorism book would have things like
> "I think, therefore I am."
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Dan Bron <[email protected]>
> Date: Wednesday, February 10, 2010 7:38
> Subject: Re: [Jchat] Newbie Musings 2: How I got to J
> To: 'Chat forum' <[email protected]>
>
>> Björn wrote:
>> >  Just out of curiosity I would like to know if what APL
>> called idioms
>> >  is also called idioms in J or if people prefer to call
>> it phrases in J
>>
>> I don't like "phrases" because it is too generic; any J sentence
>> or clause is a "phrase".  Others deprecate "idioms" because it
>> implies the meaning is unpredictable given the component words
>> (e.g. "kick the bucket"), whereas the meaning of a J idiom is
>> completely predictable from (in fact, is determined by) its
>> components words.
>>
>> What we need is a word that means "common, useful, memorable
>> phrase" or "a phrase that is so common it is essentially a word,
>> and is
>> easily recognized and recalled"*.  How about:
>>
>>       Aphorism: A concise definition, notably memorable.
>>
>> Of course, we have other choices:
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saying  .  I love WP!
>>
>> -Dan
>>
>> * This "the phrase as a word" is the motivation for the use of
>> "idiom",
>>     because as a word is composed of letters, and
>> its meaning is
>>     unrelated to those letters, so a idiom is
>> composed of words, and
>>     its meaning is unrelated to those words; I
>> think there is a technical
>>     linguisitic term for these "component words",
>> and I thought it was
>>     "lexemes", but WP disagrees.
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>



-- 
 - michael dykman
 - [email protected]

 May the Source be with you.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to