Ian Collins wrote: > Bill Shannon wrote: >> Alan.M.Wright wrote: >> >>> Share-level access may well solve Bill's requirements as well but it is >>> different >>> from null sessions/anonymous access. >>> >> I guess I'm not understanding the difference. >> >> Using Samba I'm configuring it for guest access on a per-share basis. >> >> Under Windows I share a directory and choose whether a password is >> required. >> >> In both cases I choose whether the share is read/write or read-only. >> >> From a user's point of view, what's the difference between share-level >> access that doesn't require a password and anonymous access? >> > The latter does not require a login?
Well, then that must be what I'm using, because I'm never required to login. Are you sure the user interface isn't hiding a protocol level requirement to login as guest? I sometimes do need to tell it to connect as guest, but I certainly never have to supply a password. _______________________________________________ cifs-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/cifs-discuss
