Can anybody share experiense about how many sessions with Per-Session QoS (shaping or policing) could NPE-G1 handle?
> -----???????? ?????????----- > ??: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ?? ????? David Granzer > ??????????: 10 ?????? 2008 ?. 18:35 > ????: Gregory Boehnlein > ?????: [email protected] > ????: Re: [c-nsp] CBWFQ-LLQ on PPPoE Virtual Templates > > On 4/10/08, Gregory Boehnlein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > We have a 7206 running (C7200-IK9S-M), Version > 12.3(20), RELEASE > > > > SOFTWARE (fc2). We are trying to get LLQ implemented on Virtual > > > > Template interfaces for our PPPoE DSL users: > > > > > > > > vpdn-group akrnaa01rr > > > > description SBC Akron VPDN Group > > > > accept-dialin > > > > protocol l2tp > > > > virtual-template 1 > > > > terminate-from hostname akrnaa01rr.oh.AADS > > > > local name xxxxxx > > > > lcp renegotiation always > > > > l2tp tunnel password 7 xxxxxxxxxxx > > > > > > QoS for L2TP users is not supported in your release, you > need 12.2SB, > > > take a look at the "Per-Session QoS" feature at > > > > http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_2sb/feature/guide/sbbbrs1b.html > > > > > > Excellent. Thank you very much. What does the "SB" > designation stand for? > > There are two SB releases, 122-28.SB and 122-31.SB. I'm not surre what > exactly the difference is between the two, but we have curious > experience with 122-31.SB releases with Per-Session QoS (traffic > shaping) enabled. If there a lot of PPPoE sessions (more than 3000) on > the 7301 the throughput per session goes notably down. We didn't see > this behavior with 122-28.SB. > > David > _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
