I haven't seen any with the problem, but there is a fellow in England who is
collecting pedigrees of affected dogs. He sent me a bunch to run stats on,
but that was a couple of years ago when my late mom in law was on her
deathbed and I was too busy caring for her to do anything with the
pedigrees. He had an idea about a particular dog or line, but I don't
remember which and wouldn't say here if I did remember anyway. It isn't one
that was really common in the US. I do remember that much. After finals
next week, I'll see if I can find the files he sent.

Seems like his name was Malcolm or something like that and I remember that
there was a website (his??) that had some information on the condition which
is a nasty defect. It had to do with the brain shifting down into the area
at the neck where the spinal column meets the head. Something about a
malformation in that area. Sorry to be so vague, but my brain is full of
html which I am supposed to be writing for a computer course that finishes
up next week--- instead of reading email, LOL.
All the best,
Susan Cochran


----- Original Message -----
From: "Jo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, December 09, 2001 6:13 PM
Subject: Re: [CKCS-L] International & Experience


> I know Dave can be absolutely infuriating at times.. <g>
> But this is such a wise post.  Just sensible without name calling and as
far
> as I can tell totally unjudgemental.
>
> I certainly don't meet all of Dave's criteria but he does have a right to
> look for it in his *teachers*.
>
> Jeanie, I've been doing this almost as long as you and I've been on this
> list almost as long as you and..ugh..I attended many, many CKCSCUSA
meeting
> and have heard the same stuff from the same people.  I don't know why I
pipe
> up now and again. You'd think I'd give it up but I don't I keep at and
> probably will until the end (of me).
>
> Annette sorry I assumed (ass and me!) you meant the British CKCSCUSA
club..I
> have received one 1 bulletin in the past three years.  So I missed that
> article.
> I have heard the problem mentioned during a few of my trips to England and
> have seen a dog or two with the problem.
> Jo Ann Carvill
> BJ Cavaliers
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> www.bjcavaliers.com
>
>
> > <<Surely someone who has produced consistently great dogs over a long
> period
> > of time would be regarded as a person who knew what they were doing>>
> >
> > Absolutely.  But opinions on if a dog is great or not vary greatly, are
> > somewhat subjective, and are not always tied to the number of ribbons it
> wins.
> >
> > << written lengthy articles on the breed, educated Judges on the
breed?>>
> >
> > What are the requirements to write an article?  Have you ever read
> articles
> > by someone you don't think were very good?  What are the requirements to
> hold
> > judges seminars?
> >
> >  <<What other qualities do they need? >>
> >
> > Patience, Tolerance, COURTESY,  Open minds, a managed ego... etc etc
etc.
> > Not all knowlegeable people are good teachers.  Not all smart people are
> > leaders.
> >
> > <<Why should they have to repeat time after time the same message to the
> same
> > people - who are obviously not listening or not able to comprehend the
> > message or accept the information offered. Why waste valuable time with
> such
> > people.>>
> >
> > Most people who have ever made a difference in just about anything have
> had
> > to repeat their message over and over and over.  Its patience, its
> > persistance, its part of being a leader.  So if people continue to buy
> from
> > puppy mills we should quit trying to educate them?  Don't try to educate
> the
> > less educated if they don't listen the first time?  If they don't easily
> get
> > on board why waste time with them.  Maybe the easy path to turn a blind
> eye
> > if they don't get it right away but maybe not the best path either.
> >
> > <<IMHO listing the results of your efforts, be it number of Champions,
> judging
> >  credentials etc gives your opinion some credibility and is not self
> >  promotion, it is statement of fact>>
> >
> > It is a statement of fact as to the number of ribbons you have won.  Not
> much
> > more.  Numbers can often be misleading. Only looking at what is behind
the
> > numbers tells the real story.  Is the better breeder the one with 50
> > champions or 5?  What if you find out the one who bred 50 champions bred
> > 2,000 puppies to get them a success rate of 1 in 20 while the breeder
with
> 5
> > bred 20 a 1 in 4 success rate.  Two breeders finish a champion from
their
> > kennel.  Are they equal achievements?  One was competing against 5
others
> > from the same kennel the other,  5 dogs from other kennels?  Still the
> same
> > achievement?  One beat three nationally ranked dogs the other beat none?
> > Still the same? Do you think there are big winning Champions in the USA
> that
> > couldn't win in England?  I do.  How about dogs that can't win in other
> > countrys that come here and win.  Happens.  I could go on but you get
the
> > point, titles and numbers of ribbons do not alone always tell the real
> story.
> >
> > There is no crime in bragging about one's wins or promoting oneself but
> the
> > numbers alone do NOT tell the whole story and often do not accurately
> reflect
> > the quality of the breeder by themselves.  Maybe sometimes they do.
Often
> > they don't.  Can anyone think of a breeder who has been breeding for
many
> > years and has lots of champions you would NOT reccomend?  I'll bet most
> can.
> > (no names listed hope that doesn't offend anyone)
> >
> > <<Do you not list your credentials in your work situation? to give
> yourself
> >  credibility.>>
> >
> > I list them to get the job.  The credibility comes from my actions from
> that
> > point forward.  Actions, not achievements on paper build credibility.
AND
> I
> > constantly have to prove myself over and over as new people come around
> they
> > judge for themselves based on my continued actions.  I do NOT expect
them
> to
> > immediately respect me because someone said they should or because of my
> > title.  Continued actions, continued evaluation, earns continued
respect.
> >
> > << AND as Chairperson of NZKC Judges Association I personally take great
> >  offence at your suggestion that those in our breed who also Judge
> "solicit
> >  financed judging assignments for travel and socializing". >>
> >
> > Throwing your title around doesn't intimidate me or impress me.  I'm
sorry
> if
> > my opinion offends you but I believe there is truth to it. Some do these
> > things I have mentioned.  Thats my opinion and I'm entitled to it.
> >
> > <<To cover yourself by saying you haven't put anyone into a category is
> not
> > good enough. Either name names or don't make unsubstantiated
> allegations.>>
> >
> > Sorry it isn't good enough for you that I won't name names but that
would
> > serve no productive purpose to do so on this email list and like I said,
> > people know what category they fall into they don't need me to sort
things
> > out for them.  I will continue to speak my opinion if you don't care to
> read
> > them delete my posts.  I would be glad to explain how that works if you
> like.
> >  Over and over until you get it <G>
> >
> > Dave
> > CastleMyst Cavaliers
> > http://members.aol.com/CMystCavs
>
> =========================================================
> "Magic Commands":
> to stop receiving mail for awhile, click here and send the email:
> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?body=SET%20CKCS-L%20NOMAIL
> to start it up gain click here:
> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?body=SET%20CKCS-L%20MAIL
>
>  E-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] for assistance.
> Search the Archives... http://apple.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ckcs-l.html
>
> All e-mail sent through CKCS-L is Copyright 1999 by its original author.

=========================================================
"Magic Commands":
to stop receiving mail for awhile, click here and send the email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?body=SET%20CKCS-L%20NOMAIL
to start it up gain click here:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?body=SET%20CKCS-L%20MAIL

 E-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] for assistance.
Search the Archives... http://apple.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ckcs-l.html

All e-mail sent through CKCS-L is Copyright 1999 by its original author.

Reply via email to