Well, I must be the exception to this one as I've had some mighty
strange readings on progesterone both in horses and dogs.   I suspect
that even the best labs do get it wrong, but sometimes nature does play
a part.  As I mentioned, Lee Jones (associated with Dr. Hutchison's
mobile lab) told me that numbers can be skewed due to progeserone in the
lining of the uterus rather than follicles. This happened in the case of
one of my bitches; you are right, Laura, the pregnancy didn't take.
However, I do wonder if my timing was terribly off and I didn't breed
late enough.

I also have a mare that did the strangest thing on progesterone testing
that any vets have ever seen.  She was the subject of much conjecture.
When bred, we drew a serum progesterone as she had missed prior to that.
  It came back WAY too low, so we raced to Tufts and grabbed Regumate
and injected her with that daily for a week.  We then drew another
progesterone.........it was so high as to be off the charts.  We didn't
buy that, so we drew another.......sky high; no one had ever seen that.
  We took her off the Regumate of course, and then waited a while and
drew another serum progesterone........again SKY high off the charts.
We assayed the Regumate because there is no way it should have elevated
her progesterone like that even during its one week use, nevermind
afterwards.  It assayed as being correct.  We continued to take
progesterone tests throughout this mare's pregnancy and she continued to
have unnaturally elevated progesterone.  We had no clue how this would
effect the foal.  Her milk glands swelled with major edemas.....which
never did return to normal. I was really worried.

She foaled normally, the foal was beautiful and fine....nursing went
fine......she is now a performance and breeding mare in a breeder's
barn.  However, I've come to the conclusion that there is much more
about reproduction that we don't know than what we do know.

Best,

Suze

Laura Trunk wrote:


> I have progesterone tested many, many bitches over 5 years.  I have yet to
> see many strange numbers from the lab results.  The numbers seem dead on,
> progress very nicely and with natural breedings done after the bitches hit
> *5* virtually always result in pregnancy.  The few bitches who had weird
> readings or did not get pregnant nearly always turned out to have a problem
> of some sort and either never got pregnant or took some *work* to get
> pregnant.
>
> Laura Lang
>
>


--
Suze at Llawen Cavaliers
"...I have seen that in any great undertaking it is not enough for a man
to depend simply upon himself."  -Isna Ia-wica
"Thought comes before speech" Luther Standing Bear

=========================================================
"Magic Commands":
to stop receiving mail for awhile, click here and send the email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?body=SET%20CKCS-L%20NOMAIL
to start it up gain click here:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?body=SET%20CKCS-L%20MAIL

 E-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] for assistance.
Search the Archives... http://apple.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ckcs-l.html

All e-mail sent through CKCS-L is Copyright 2002 by its original author.

Reply via email to