Barb, it is more rare for a wholecolor to carry for parti than the other way
around. A dominant BT is more rare than a BT which carries for red.

One way to know about the recessive genes is to look at the pedigree of the
wholecolor. If you have a BT from a breeding of Ruby x BT then that BT will
carry for red. A BT from several generations of BT breeding is more likely
to be dominant for black, but still has the possibility of carrying for red.
I can look at the colors on a pedigree and have a good idea of what the dog
will produce-- not absolute but close.
All the best,
Susan Cochran

All the best,
Susan Cochran
----- Original Message -----
From: "Barbara Cooke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 3:44 PM
Subject: Re: [CKCS-L] Color genetics


> Ok, last question, I promise. So a black and tan that does not carry for
broken
> color is a rare thing and will only produce black and tans no matter what
it is
> bred with? (And the only way to tell is by seeing several litters with no
red
> or parti color.) ???
> --
> Barb Cooke
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Galveston Island, Texas
>
> =========================================================
> "Magic Commands":
> to stop receiving mail for awhile, click here and send the email:
> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?body=SET%20CKCS-L%20NOMAIL
> to start it up gain click here:
> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?body=SET%20CKCS-L%20MAIL
>
>  E-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] for assistance.
> Search the Archives... http://apple.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ckcs-l.html
>
> All e-mail sent through CKCS-L is Copyright 2002 by its original author.

=========================================================
"Magic Commands":
to stop receiving mail for awhile, click here and send the email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?body=SET%20CKCS-L%20NOMAIL
to start it up gain click here:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?body=SET%20CKCS-L%20MAIL

 E-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] for assistance.
Search the Archives... http://apple.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ckcs-l.html

All e-mail sent through CKCS-L is Copyright 2002 by its original author.

Reply via email to