On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 8:10 PM, Tal Liron <tal.li...@gmail.com> wrote: > I did realize pretty early on that the contribs were not all of prime > quality, but what other choice did I have? Fall back to standard JVM API?
I'm curious, what parts of contrib are you relying on that haven't found active maintainers? Perhaps we can figure out how to address that, to reduce your pain? > What I would want to see is a coherent standard library that is centrally > maintained. Not everything deserves to be there, of course, but there are > obvious candidates for essentials. I think it's worth discussing what's "essential" in contrib. If there are unmaintained modules that folks think are essential, let's figure out how to get those maintained again and moved into new contrib. -- Sean A Corfield -- (904) 302-SEAN An Architect's View -- http://corfield.org/ World Singles, LLC. -- http://worldsingles.com/ Railo Technologies, Inc. -- http://www.getrailo.com/ "Perfection is the enemy of the good." -- Gustave Flaubert, French realist novelist (1821-1880) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
