On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 10:26 AM, Sheng Yang <sh...@yasker.org> wrote: > On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 10:20 AM, Anthony Xu <xuefei...@citrix.com> wrote: >> My misunderstanding, I thought that's the link-local ip in Xenserver or >> KVM:-) >> >> If a VM is on both IPv6 and IPv4 network, what's the link-local address? >> IPv4? IPv6? Both? > > For dual stack case, we still require IPv6 link-local address only.
I meant, for user VM... I think we may still need IPv4 link local for Xenserver/KVM. :) --Sheng > > --Sheng >> >> >> Anthony >> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Sheng Yang [mailto:sh...@yasker.org] >>> Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 10:13 AM >>> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org >>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] IPv6 support draft functional spec(phase 1) >>> >>> On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 9:49 AM, Anthony Xu <xuefei...@citrix.com> >>> wrote: >>> > Thanks for the write-up, >>> > >>> > One comment, >>> > Is there any reason not use link-local IPv4 address? >>> > >>> >>*User VM would have one link-local IPv6 address >>> >>> IPv6 required one auto configured link local address per nic(means >>> likely one nic would have more than one IP address, and in the >>> different subnet), and the link local address would be used to send >>> out DHCP request etc(http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3315). It's also >>> the basic of Neighbor discovery mechanism in >>> IPv6(http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4861). >>> >>> I think IPv4 link-local is less relevant in this case... >>> >>> --Sheng >>> > >>> >> -----Original Message----- >>> >> From: Sheng Yang [mailto:sh...@yasker.org] >>> >> Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2013 7:11 PM >>> >> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org >>> >> Subject: [DISCUSS] IPv6 support draft functional spec(phase 1) >>> >> >>> >> Hi, >>> >> >>> >> The first draft of IPv6 FS is available at >>> >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/IPv6+support >>> >> now. >>> >> >>> >> Basically based on our previous discussion, we would like to stick >>> to >>> >> dnsmasq, and assume shared network for advance zone in the phase one, >>> >> to make thing as simple as possible in phase 1. >>> >> >>> >> Comments/questions are welcome! >>> >> >>> >> --Sheng
