Can you please update the FS that you will focus on KVM & Xen for CS 4.1 release?
Regards, Manan Shah On 1/23/13 5:38 PM, "Sheng Yang" <sh...@yasker.org> wrote: >On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 5:15 PM, Manan Shah <manan.s...@citrix.com> wrote: >> Sheng, the FS does not talk about any Hypervisor limitations. Is it >> assumed that this feature would be supported on all hypervisors? > >Yes. We would focus on KVM and Xen first. > >--Sheng >> >> Regards, >> Manan Shah >> >> >> >> >> On 1/22/13 12:58 PM, "Sheng Yang" <sh...@yasker.org> wrote: >> >>>On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 5:56 AM, Chip Childers >>><chip.child...@sungard.com> wrote: >>>> On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 7:15 AM, Wido den Hollander <w...@widodh.nl> >>>>wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 01/21/2013 07:21 PM, Chiradeep Vittal wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> DHCPv6 does not support/allow you to send default gateway. This is >>>>>>³by >>>>>> design². >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Yes, you are right! I completely forgot that. >>>>> >>>>> So Router Advertisements are the only way to go in this case indeed. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> I don't get the same "rushed" feeling as you do. >>>>>> There's > 200 RFCs for IPv6. It is a large and complicated topic and >>>>>>not >>>>>> many people have experience with it (see above). I feel that it is >>>>>>best to >>>>>> approach it incrementally and learn our lessons along the way. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> We just have to make sure that the *experimental* label stays on it >>>>>and warn >>>>> that stuff can change. >>>>> >>>>> Wido >>>> >>>> +1 to incremental development, and +1*10 for labeling it >>>> "experimental" for at least the first couple of releases! >>> >>>+1.. >>> >>>--Sheng >>
