On 01/21/2013 07:21 PM, Chiradeep Vittal wrote:
DHCPv6 does not support/allow you to send default gateway. This is ³by
design².
Yes, you are right! I completely forgot that.
So Router Advertisements are the only way to go in this case indeed.
I don't get the same "rushed" feeling as you do.
There's > 200 RFCs for IPv6. It is a large and complicated topic and not
many people have experience with it (see above). I feel that it is best to
approach it incrementally and learn our lessons along the way.
We just have to make sure that the *experimental* label stays on it and
warn that stuff can change.
Wido
On 1/20/13 10:33 AM, "Wido den Hollander" <w...@widodh.nl> wrote:
Hi,
On 01/17/2013 04:11 AM, Sheng Yang wrote:
Hi,
The first draft of IPv6 FS is available at
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/IPv6+support
now.
Basically based on our previous discussion, we would like to stick to
dnsmasq, and assume shared network for advance zone in the phase one,
to make thing as simple as possible in phase 1.
Comments/questions are welcome!
What's the reason for not doing this in basic networking first? Isn't
that the easiest one?
I'm getting the feeling that this implementation will be rushed in by
just skipping a lot of things just to get *some* IPv6 in CloudStack.
We can't just add IPv6 and say *experimental* because people will start
using it.
And why is there a need for radvd when using DHCPv6?
Wido
--Sheng
