Thanks. Regards, Manan Shah
On 1/24/13 1:53 PM, "Sheng Yang" <sh...@yasker.org> wrote: >On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 1:40 PM, Manan Shah <manan.s...@citrix.com> wrote: >> Can you please update the FS that you will focus on KVM & Xen for CS 4.1 >> release? > >Updated. > >--Sheng >> >> Regards, >> Manan Shah >> >> >> >> >> On 1/23/13 5:38 PM, "Sheng Yang" <sh...@yasker.org> wrote: >> >>>On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 5:15 PM, Manan Shah <manan.s...@citrix.com> >>>wrote: >>>> Sheng, the FS does not talk about any Hypervisor limitations. Is it >>>> assumed that this feature would be supported on all hypervisors? >>> >>>Yes. We would focus on KVM and Xen first. >>> >>>--Sheng >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Manan Shah >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 1/22/13 12:58 PM, "Sheng Yang" <sh...@yasker.org> wrote: >>>> >>>>>On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 5:56 AM, Chip Childers >>>>><chip.child...@sungard.com> wrote: >>>>>> On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 7:15 AM, Wido den Hollander <w...@widodh.nl> >>>>>>wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 01/21/2013 07:21 PM, Chiradeep Vittal wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> DHCPv6 does not support/allow you to send default gateway. This >>>>>>>>is >>>>>>>>³by >>>>>>>> design². >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Yes, you are right! I completely forgot that. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> So Router Advertisements are the only way to go in this case >>>>>>>indeed. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I don't get the same "rushed" feeling as you do. >>>>>>>> There's > 200 RFCs for IPv6. It is a large and complicated topic >>>>>>>>and >>>>>>>>not >>>>>>>> many people have experience with it (see above). I feel that it is >>>>>>>>best to >>>>>>>> approach it incrementally and learn our lessons along the way. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> We just have to make sure that the *experimental* label stays on it >>>>>>>and warn >>>>>>> that stuff can change. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Wido >>>>>> >>>>>> +1 to incremental development, and +1*10 for labeling it >>>>>> "experimental" for at least the first couple of releases! >>>>> >>>>>+1.. >>>>> >>>>>--Sheng >>>> >>
